EIP712 is it really working?

Hello, i’m using the Metamask EIP712 V3 signtype, and I keep getting “invalid signature”

I seperate the signature into the v,r, s format where v = “27” or “28” along with the r =“0x” + “some bytes” and s =“0x” + “some bytes”

yet I am still getting an “invalid signature” after signing the exact message format that is outlined in the contract itself.

The contract hash is on FTM and the contract address is 0x2CB3c6b6f41eAB27a0E21DE99d41733b10E17feb

2 Likes

Hey @ceeonchain, welcome to the MetaMask community! :fox_face:

Are you using a Trezor? If so, this was just updated :point_down:

Here is also some more information on the MetaMask docs that may help you:

This topic was automatically closed 30 days after the last reply. New replies are no longer allowed.